diff --git a/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapCRUDRepo.kt b/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapCRUDRepo.kt
index dd92ce2c028..c9aa60c63f4 100644
--- a/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapCRUDRepo.kt
+++ b/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapCRUDRepo.kt
@@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ import dev.inmo.micro_utils.coroutines.withWriteLock
 import dev.inmo.micro_utils.pagination.*
 import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.*
 
+/**
+ * [Map]-based [ReadMapCRUDRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker] (mostly with
+ * [SmartRWLocker.withReadAcquire])
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [Map] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case
+ * you are using your own [Map] as a [map] you should be careful with operations on this [map]
+ */
 class ReadMapCRUDRepo<ObjectType, IdType>(
     private val map: Map<IdType, ObjectType> = emptyMap(),
     private val locker: SmartRWLocker = SmartRWLocker()
@@ -47,6 +54,13 @@ class ReadMapCRUDRepo<ObjectType, IdType>(
     }
 }
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [WriteMapCRUDRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker] (mostly with
+ * [SmartRWLocker.withWriteLock])
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [MutableMap] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case
+ * you are using your own [MutableMap] as a [map] you should be careful with operations on this [map]
+ */
 abstract class WriteMapCRUDRepo<ObjectType, IdType, InputValueType>(
     protected val map: MutableMap<IdType, ObjectType> = mutableMapOf(),
     protected val locker: SmartRWLocker = SmartRWLocker()
@@ -98,6 +112,12 @@ abstract class WriteMapCRUDRepo<ObjectType, IdType, InputValueType>(
 
 }
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [MapCRUDRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker]
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [MutableMap] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case
+ * you are using your own [MutableMap] as a [map] you should be careful with operations on this [map]
+ */
 abstract class MapCRUDRepo<ObjectType, IdType, InputValueType>(
     map: MutableMap<IdType, ObjectType>,
     locker: SmartRWLocker = SmartRWLocker()
@@ -105,6 +125,12 @@ abstract class MapCRUDRepo<ObjectType, IdType, InputValueType>(
     ReadCRUDRepo<ObjectType, IdType> by ReadMapCRUDRepo(map, locker),
     WriteMapCRUDRepo<ObjectType, IdType, InputValueType>(map, locker)
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [MapCRUDRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker]
+ *
+ * **Warning**: Besides, in case you are using your own [MutableMap] as a [map] you should be careful with operations
+ * on this [map]
+ */
 fun <ObjectType, IdType, InputValueType> MapCRUDRepo(
     map: MutableMap<IdType, ObjectType>,
     updateCallback: suspend MutableMap<IdType, ObjectType>.(newValue: InputValueType, id: IdType, old: ObjectType) -> ObjectType,
@@ -120,12 +146,21 @@ fun <ObjectType, IdType, InputValueType> MapCRUDRepo(
     override suspend fun createObject(newValue: InputValueType): Pair<IdType, ObjectType> = map.createCallback(newValue)
 }
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [MapCRUDRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker]
+ */
 fun <ObjectType, IdType, InputValueType> MapCRUDRepo(
     updateCallback: suspend MutableMap<IdType, ObjectType>.(newValue: InputValueType, id: IdType, old: ObjectType) -> ObjectType,
     locker: SmartRWLocker = SmartRWLocker(),
     createCallback: suspend MutableMap<IdType, ObjectType>.(newValue: InputValueType) -> Pair<IdType, ObjectType>
 ) = MapCRUDRepo(mutableMapOf(), updateCallback, locker, createCallback)
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [MapCRUDRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker]
+ *
+ * **Warning**: Besides, in case you are using your own [MutableMap] as a [this] you should be careful with operations
+ * on this [this]
+ */
 fun <ObjectType, IdType, InputValueType> MutableMap<IdType, ObjectType>.asCrudRepo(
     updateCallback: suspend MutableMap<IdType, ObjectType>.(newValue: InputValueType, id: IdType, old: ObjectType) -> ObjectType,
     locker: SmartRWLocker = SmartRWLocker(),
diff --git a/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapKeyValueRepo.kt b/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapKeyValueRepo.kt
index 1d5c5599572..71ccd98c865 100644
--- a/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapKeyValueRepo.kt
+++ b/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapKeyValueRepo.kt
@@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ import dev.inmo.micro_utils.pagination.utils.reverse
 import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.Flow
 import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.MutableSharedFlow
 
+/**
+ * [Map]-based [ReadKeyValueRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker] (mostly with
+ * [SmartRWLocker.withReadAcquire])
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [Map] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case you are
+ * using your own [Map] as a [map] you should be careful with operations on this [map]
+ */
 class ReadMapKeyValueRepo<Key, Value>(
     protected val map: Map<Key, Value>,
     private val locker: SmartRWLocker
@@ -70,6 +77,13 @@ class ReadMapKeyValueRepo<Key, Value>(
     override suspend fun count(): Long = locker.withReadAcquire { map.size.toLong() }
 }
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [WriteKeyValueRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker] (mostly with
+ * [SmartRWLocker.withWriteLock])
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [MutableMap] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case
+ * you are using your own [MutableMap] as a [map] you should be careful with operations on this [map]
+ */
 class WriteMapKeyValueRepo<Key, Value>(
     private val map: MutableMap<Key, Value>,
     private val locker: SmartRWLocker
@@ -107,6 +121,12 @@ class WriteMapKeyValueRepo<Key, Value>(
     }
 }
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [KeyValueRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker]
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [MutableMap] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case
+ * you are using your own [MutableMap] as a [map] you should be careful with operations on this [map]
+ */
 @Suppress("DELEGATED_MEMBER_HIDES_SUPERTYPE_OVERRIDE")
 class MapKeyValueRepo<Key, Value>(
     private val map: MutableMap<Key, Value>,
@@ -120,4 +140,10 @@ class MapKeyValueRepo<Key, Value>(
     }
 }
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [KeyValueRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker]
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [MutableMap] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case
+ * you are using your own [MutableMap] as a [this] you should be careful with operations on this [this]
+ */
 fun <K, V> MutableMap<K, V>.asKeyValueRepo(locker: SmartRWLocker = SmartRWLocker()): KeyValueRepo<K, V> = MapKeyValueRepo(this, locker)
diff --git a/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapKeyValuesRepo.kt b/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapKeyValuesRepo.kt
index 2d35f352b65..c1c61edcc79 100644
--- a/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapKeyValuesRepo.kt
+++ b/repos/inmemory/src/commonMain/kotlin/dev/inmo/micro_utils/repos/MapKeyValuesRepo.kt
@@ -8,6 +8,13 @@ import dev.inmo.micro_utils.pagination.utils.paginate
 import dev.inmo.micro_utils.pagination.utils.reverse
 import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.*
 
+/**
+ * [Map]-based [ReadKeyValuesRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker] (mostly with
+ * [SmartRWLocker.withReadAcquire])
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [Map] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case
+ * you are using your own [Map] as a [map] you should be careful with operations on this [map]
+ */
 class MapReadKeyValuesRepo<Key, Value>(
     private val map: Map<Key, List<Value>> = emptyMap(),
     private val locker: SmartRWLocker = SmartRWLocker()
@@ -63,6 +70,13 @@ class MapReadKeyValuesRepo<Key, Value>(
     override suspend fun count(): Long = locker.withReadAcquire { map.size }.toLong()
 }
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [WriteKeyValuesRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker] (mostly with
+ * [SmartRWLocker.withWriteLock])
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [MutableMap] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case
+ * you are using your own [MutableMap] as a [map] you should be careful with operations on this [map]
+ */
 class MapWriteKeyValuesRepo<Key, Value>(
     private val map: MutableMap<Key, MutableList<Value>> = mutableMapOf(),
     private val locker: SmartRWLocker = SmartRWLocker()
@@ -133,6 +147,12 @@ class MapWriteKeyValuesRepo<Key, Value>(
     }
 }
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [KeyValuesRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker]
+ *
+ * **Warning**: It is not recommended to use constructor with both [MutableMap] and [SmartRWLocker]. Besides, in case
+ * you are using your own [MutableMap] as a [map] you should be careful with operations on this [map]
+ */
 @Suppress("DELEGATED_MEMBER_HIDES_SUPERTYPE_OVERRIDE")
 class MapKeyValuesRepo<Key, Value>(
     private val map: MutableMap<Key, MutableList<Value>> = mutableMapOf(),
@@ -141,6 +161,11 @@ class MapKeyValuesRepo<Key, Value>(
     ReadKeyValuesRepo<Key, Value> by MapReadKeyValuesRepo(map, locker),
     WriteKeyValuesRepo<Key, Value> by MapWriteKeyValuesRepo(map, locker)
 
+/**
+ * [MutableMap]-based [KeyValuesRepo]. All internal operations will be locked with [locker]
+ *
+ * **Warning**: In case you are using your own [MutableMap] as [this] receiver you should be careful with operations on [this] map
+ */
 fun <K, V> MutableMap<K, List<V>>.asKeyValuesRepo(locker: SmartRWLocker = SmartRWLocker()): KeyValuesRepo<K, V> = MapKeyValuesRepo(
     map { (k, v) -> k to v.toMutableList() }.toMap().toMutableMap(),
     locker